Tripod DIY - Repairing or Making Your Own Quick Release

The Vivitar VPT-3600 Tripod

When I bought my Sony a200 DSLR the shop owner promised to give me a free tripod and I got it after a few days. The catch? It had no quick release plate or the fastening latch. I kept it unused for a long time. Recently I figured I could use it as a light stand and also put an umbrella adapter for full fledged use in the studio.

This model is made by Vivitar and is called the VPT-3600. It is retailing for INR 2,250 on ebay brand new. This model is very light and can be used as a travel tripod.  

After some more time I realized I can make the quick release myself. So I studied a lot of things online but nothing seemed to help. Unfortunately tripods come in variety of sizes and configurations. So do the quick releases as there is no universal standard in their size and function.

Slot for the Tripod quick release plate

I briefly even considered making the quick release by making a wooden cast and melting some plastic but realized that would be too much of a hassle and I didn’t have the tools or the expertise.

I figured the tripod is salvageable after all.

The Vivitar logo and mostly faded model name

I drew up the schematics and dimensions of the top plate.

I still haven’t made it, but sharing the info. Will soon put up the pictures or may be a video lets see.

What I am using is:

1. 3 screws to fix the wood plate
2. Some metal and rubber washers
3. A ¾ inch hard aluminum (ideally somethign hard like a metal)top plate that will sit on top of the wooden plate
4. A ¾ inch piece of wood with a thickness of 1 ¼ inch
5. A ¼ inch bolt that will into the bottom of the camera.     

If you have a carpenter’s workshop in your area you can get it done or volunteer to do it yourself, but be careful while working the vice, saws and drilling machine.

to be continued....

Studio Lighting Setup For Photographer On A Budget

A translucent shoot through umbrella 

Firstly, I would like to begin by saying that all or atleast most of the photography lighting equipment and gear out there is very expensive. I cannot emphasize enough on photography and lighting as they are two sides of the same coin.

After checking out the prices of photography light kits online, I decided to put together my own DIY style photography lighting setup. Its been a long time now since I have been thinking about it and I wanted to setup my own cheap, unique and effective lighting system under a budget. So I started asking, looking around and found many inexpensive solutions.  

In Hyderabad, where I live, like everywhere else, photo goods are expensive as hell. I originally wanted to put together a strobe/flash system but after much calculations realized it will cost me nearly INR 30,000 (approx. $550) for all the lighting and related accessories. 30,000 for me is not a small amount. So I started considering other options i.e cheap manual/semi automatic flashes instead of strobes. Remember if you are buying strobes you will also have to buy sturdier stands to support their weight. With flashes you don’t have that problem. 

Btw this article is NOT about Strobes Vs Flashes, but Expensive Vs Inexpensive lighting.

I feel using a flash system instead of the strobes is not only economical but it is also very portable. Can you put strobe lights in your cargo pants? I don’t think so haha. 

I did look for information on many online forums before preparing this lighting setup. We shall compare flash system with the strobe system in relation to their cost and related accessories.

A pair of elinchrome strobes on stands with soft boxes

Here is a list for the costly strobe system:

       1.Two Prolinchrome strobes – INR 18,000

       2.Two stands – INR 3,000

       3.Two reflective or shoot through umbrellas – INR 300

       4.Two simpex triggers – 1,200

       5.Umbrella mounts for stand – INR 700

       6.Cables/connectors – INR 3,000

This is just a basic list. With some more accessories the total cost of the setup will come to nearly INR 30,000.

Lets see how we fare with the flash setup we have devised.

Note: The all manual Yongnou flashes have no TTL or iTTL but you can use them to trigger other flashes/lights/strobes in Pilot/Commander/Master mode. All you need is appropriate camera settings. I am mentioning Yongnou because they have good reviews online. Some of their latest models do support TTL. You can add your own favorite brand in the list. Btw the Yongnuo YN560-II at just $77 is a great flash gun.

Yongnou 560EX flashgun (pic stolen from Yongnou site)

Some photographers swear by proprietary flash guns from Canon and Nikon. Its their opinion. The supposed quality itself does not justify the high price of these flashes that cost more than two strobes. Both Canon flash and Nikon flash are extremely expensive. Nikon’s Speedlight SB-910 and Canon’s 600 EX-RT Flash guns both cost INR 33,000+. Yes, a single flash gun from Canon or Nikon costs almost as much as 4 strobes. Yeah ! its crazy expensive and also ridiculous. But if you are really crazy about proprietary flashes then you can buy them on the used market for much less. 

Remember there many even thousands of inexpensive flash gun brands like Yongnou, Polaroid, Vivitar, Metz, Nissin and many many unknown brands. The mechanics inside any flash is almost same, so there are very much repairable and salvageable if they give trouble or anything.     

Sigma flash

With this list we are trying to go as low as possible money wise. If you have some more bucks you can choose accessories with more/better specs.

        1.Two Yongnuo manual flashes - INR 4,000

        2.Two Yongnow triggers – INR 2500

        3.Two reflective or shoot through umbrellas – INR 300

        4.Two light stands – INR 1400

        5.Umbrella mounts for light stand – INR 700

       The costing of this list is coming to a grand total of INR 8,900.

       So with this photography lighting setup you are saving INR 21,100 (approx $383). Yes a huge amount indeed. This setup is extremely useful for a small studio that is primarily into portrait photography.

Light stands

You can buy pro gear when you start making money off of your assignments, until then you have to make do with what you have and get creative.

When you are working with manual/inexpensive flashes like Yongnou or Vivitar etc you have to understand their limitations and have to turn these limitations into your advantages. On that note I would like to add that there is no shame in being poor and having no money for expensive gear. It’s really the disadvantages that teach you great lessons. In life you have two options, either you can drown your problems with a truck load of money or learn to work with your limitations and turn them into learning opportunities, creating, developing ingenious ideas and having lot of fun along your journey as a photographer.

Godspeed.....

Lowepro Photo Traveler 150 (Mica) Camera Bag Review

The Lowepro Photo Traveler 150 Mica on a chair. 

I put it on a chair so you will have a better idea about its size.

I really never wrote any camera bag reviews but seeing as it is, I thought may be this will be useful for someone.  Firstly to begin with this is a very small bag. Its very inconvenient when you don’t have a dedicated camera bag. 

Before buying this camera bag, I would carry my gear in a normal backpack with my jacket as padding. I used to think I didn’t need a dedicated camera bag. But hell, no. I had to buy one. It does not look professional when you are taking the gear out of your bag like a magician is taking out stuff from his hat, you never know what’s coming next. When you are working with a team, it is very embarrassing.  

Inside the Lowepro Photo Traveler 150 Mica bag. 

The empty space you see is where I kept my Nikon D200

So I started searching camera gear sites for suitable, affordable bags with different features. I wanted to buy something below $60 (Approx.INR 3000). So after searching a lot I finally found the Lowepro 150 Mica (INR 2499) to be a suitable one on flipkart.com. I was impressed with all the things I saw crammed in it. In the pictures and videos the bag looked big enough, so I placed an order. It came almost after 2 days from Bangalore which is fast enough. I opened the box and was shocked.

The bag is just a little bigger than a normal lunch box. I considered sending it back after I tried to fit in my D200 and it was difficult.  I called up the site but they wouldn’t take it back. I also posted an ad online but ZERO responses. Heck, may be its destiny. I decided to keep it anyway. I unpacked all my gear from the sleeve they were in and one by one tried to put in all my gear, which isn’t too much. I realized, to fit in my gear, I had to remove some compartments. I did. Slowly one by one, to my own surprise, I managed to cram every piece of equipment I had into this camera bag, which is a wonder in itself.

This is what all I put in

1. Nikon D200 with 18-55 lens
2. Nikon battery charger
3. Nikon batteries – 2 nos
4. Sigma 28-105 lens
5. Sony a200 camera body
6. Sony 18-70 lens
7. Sony battery charger
8. Sony battery   

   In the top panel  

      :
1. Sony HDMI cable
2. A multi card reader
3. Sony power cable       
4. Nikon power cable
5. One CF card
6. paddings that I removed from the bag

There is a provision for a pen/lens pen in the top panel. My only gripe is that there is no more space for a flash gun. I am thinking may be I can cram it in somewhere if I bend it 90 degrees and forego my Sigma 28-105mm lens. To adjust and utilize the space I stored my Sony a200 and the Sony kit lens 18-70 separately.

The quality of the bag is very good. It’s well stitched, well zippered, well planned. Only the size is a deal breaker. There are so many other bags so much bigger and at half the price. I feel $50 for a bag of this size is way too much money. The only consolation is the quality. 

This bag is strictly for amateurs who have minimal equipment. On a weekend holiday if you are going somewhere for a photo-walk or something then this bag is for you. Luckily, in there, somewhere, you can also fit in a couple of sandwiches for lunch.  

Bon Appetit !

                                                             

Going full frame on a budget with film cameras

I wrote many articles on film photography and cameras before. With a recent increase in the usage of high-end (and also costly) full frame cameras I wondered if guys with small pockets had any choices. Ofcourse they do.

Film photography is cheap, output is qualitative and within the reach of common man. 

Given the prices of high end cameras like Nikon D3x (almost $8000) and Canon 1Ds Mark III (almost $7000), there has never been a good time to choose film photography. Inspite of the shortcomings of film, the advantages far outweigh the heavy price tags of the aforementioned cameras. It is of note that no matter how high-end a DSLR is, it can never replicate the cinematic aura of the film camera.

Even in this day and age of digital saturation there still some purists who shoot on film. A certain percentage of top tier fashion photographers still shoot film. Terry Richardson shoots with a Yashic T4, Miles Aldridge shoots with a Rollieflex, I don’t exactly know which camera but David Bailey too shoots exclusively on film and there are many others like them.

 If your primary professional work demands speed then film photography isn’t for you. Modern journalism is a bit difficult with film, but for magazines like National Geographic where the assignment time is several months, film photography may be most suitable. 

For any up and coming fashion photographer money is the most important criteria. Instead of investing thousands of dollars on camera bodies additionally some more thousands on the subsequent lenses, it is wiser to start off with a good reliable film camera system. The lenses too for film cameras come very cheap. Choose a good system and you are as good as your friend with the 1Ds Mark III. 

 

No matter how expensive a digital camera can never deliver the color rendition of a film camera. A while ago I read somebody’s quote that capturing all the information on the film frame will generate a image file of 1500MB (That’s 1.5GB) and that means shooting with a 500 megapixel camera. Just think about it. 

In this article I have listed what all you need to start off your film photography. 

When buying a film camera see to it that you buy something that has/supports auto focus lenses. This way it will save some valuable time, when it is factor. 

 

You can easily learn film processing and also setting up your own dark room very cheaply. Digitizing film is also not rocket science. You can do it with a good capable computer and scanner system

The whole point of this article is not to tell you to throw away your digital cameras, but only to tell you that there is also an economical alternative to full frame DSLRs.

And remember, without curiosity, inspiration and imagination no matter how high end camera you have, you are just a guy in the middle of the ocean with no sails.    

Happy Clicking.

--Viisshnu Vardhan--

So which camera for the semi-professional? Nikon? Canon? Or Sony?

 

For some strange reason, from the very beginning of my career I have been a Nikon fan boy. Some how Nikon cameras seemed more professional than Canon cameras, in my hands. Ofcourse there is no question Canon makes a lot of good cameras as well. 

This camera research came about since I am planning on selling off my trusty and excellent Nikon D200 (while I can) and buy myself a newer camera. There have been many cameras in my mind, lets look at them one by one.

Nikon D7000

Being the Nikon fan boy, the very first camera I considered is the Nikon D7000. It came out towards the end of 2010. The camera itself is fine, but in comparison to the excellent Nikon D300s, it falls short on a lot of parameters. Firstly the D7000 is an ‘enthusiast’ camera. In Nikon speak that means ‘not professional’. 

This camera is for those who want to upgrade from the entry level cameras like D3100, D3200, D5100, D5200 etc. Comparing this camera to the D300s would be highly unfair. Both cameras are targeted at different buyers and different markets. It’s a ‘filler’ model that closes the gap between pro cameras and entry level cameras.

Simply the D300s is a far superior camera with higher fps, better IQ, a complete magnesium alloy body and better weather sealing. Incidentally the D7000 does not have a complete magnesium alloy body. Only the top and back panels are. The rest is poly carbonate. So it’s not as robust as the D300s.  The picture quality too didn’t seem exceptional, like the D300s. I also doubt the weather sealing on the D7000 is also not as extensive.

D7100

 

Next in line is the Nikon D7100, the latest replacement for the D7000 which came out in Feb 2013. It is being positioned as a ‘flagship’ DX DSLR by Nikon, but does it have the caliber to be considered so? Let see.

The D7100 boasts a number of improvements over the D7000, which include a newly designed 24.1 megapixel sensor, Nikon EXPEED 3 image-processing engine, 3D Color Matrix Metering II 2,016-pixel RGB sensor, ISO sensitivity 100 to 6400 (up to 25600 with boost), 3.2-inch, TFT LCD monitor with 1,228,800-dot resolution, the elimination of the low pass filter (like the D800E), 51 AF points (same as D300s), 1,50,000 shutter actuations (same as D300s). 

Even with such an impressive spec list, it still does not match up to the D300s in output quality or picture IQ. Should you buy it? At your own risk.

Nikon D90

The Nikon D90 is a poor photographer’s ‘pro like’ camera. I have seen a lot of wedding photographers use it. Surprisingly it outscores boththe professional Nikon D200 and latest feature laden Canon 600D. The spec list is not all that bad and includes a 12.2 megapixel sensor, live view, built in focus motor, self cleaning sensor and more.

I feel, irrespective of its short comings compared to the D7000 and D7100, the D90 is still a lot better and affordable camera than both.  The shortcomings ? a completely poly carbonate body with no magnesium alloy panels and neither any weather sealing. 

With the latest DSLRs boasting 24fps, 30fps at 1080p video, this one with just 720p video is a sham, still it’s the first DSLR in the world to have a video mode. 

Canon 600D

This is only camera I felt comfortable with regarding the picture quality and IQ. Though it’s the latest and is feature laden, surprisingly the Nikon D90 still outscores it. What I like about this camera is, it is super affordable @ INR 38,000 and boasts an impressive spec list that includes an 18 megapixel sensor, Full HD 1080p video recording at 24/25/30 frame/s, DIGIC 4 image processor, Eye-Fi card support and much more. 

It is the follow-up to the very successful Canon 550D. The color reproduction and tonality are as good as the 5D Mark II. No kidding, the rendition is on par with the Mark II. Can it be used professionally? Since I have seen the pictures, YES absolutely. 

The catch? No weather sealing and no magnesium alloy body, but at just INR 38,000/- it’s a damn good deal.

I didn’t research the Canon 650D as it’s too high priced for my tastes right now. It’s almost in the bracket of the semi-pro 60D. Its costs INR 20,000/-more than the 600D. Are you kidding me Canon?

Sony a37

Let me begin by saying that I own an excellent Sony a200 DSLR whose quality matches if not exceeds that of high-end cameras of Nikon and Canon.

It is common knowledge that Sony’s technology is light years ahead of Canon and Nikon. Atleast on paper that’s partially true. The spec list of the Sony a37 far exceeds the competition, yes that’s true, but if it does not translate into good pictures then what’s the point?  

The a37 is a poor follow up to the a35 and it couldn’t impress me with the image quality. In a non-studio, daily life shooting scenario, I don’t think this camera will perform well. So far the pictures I have seen seemed to be very dull, un-contrasty with washed out colors. 

Since it is an entry level camera, no weather sealing or magnesium alloy body (yes, I am kidding). It’s also smallish compared to other cameras. Costs around INR 29,000/- Can you skip this camera? YES.  

Conclusion: In the mid line-up only the D90 and D300s seem to be holding on their own. In Canon, since the 550D has been discontinued, the most logical choice is the 600D.

--Viisshnu--

Good Lenses for Fashion Photography

Offline or online there is no definitive answer as to what particular lenses we need to do specialist jobs like fashion photography. Some prefer zooms and some primes. Out of these two, prime lenses seem to have better sharpness, though I haven’t tested or compared the two.

They say it’s the photographer not the lens. Yes its true for some jobs but for specialist jobs like fashion, jewelery etc. gear matters a lot.

Since the last few weeks I have been doing an enormous amount of research online (where else) on lenses suitable for fashion photography. Since I am primarily a Nikon shooter I will list out some Nikon lenses here. The same equivalent focal length and aperture lenses are available in Canon, Sony and Pentax as well. 

Firstly I would like to remind you that these specialist lenses do not come cheap and may cost hundreds of dollars or even more than a thousand dollars. You CANNOT do fashion photography with cheap lenses like the 50mm 1.8D because it will ‘show’ on the picture. The optical properties, optical formula, coating on these lenses is not as good as expensive lenses. Doing fashion photography with a 50mm 1.8D may work sometimes in some lighting conditions but you may not always be lucky. Don’t count on your luck, get the better lens. 

Even though these expensive lenses are a bit of a financial strain you will have invest in them. Over a period of time these lenses will pay for themselves and they are a better investment than camera bodies.

Unfortunately to make matters worse, even Nikon does not mention what kind of lenses it has for fashion, the classification of their lens selection is pretty generic.

As a reference I had a few month old Nikon lens catalogue along with a price list. I painstakingly started researching each lens and what kind of pictures it produced and went through thousands of pictures on both flickr and 500px. My main criteria were color reproduction, sharpness and contrast. NOT price.

The G (Gelded, with no aperture ring) series lenses somehow seem to have a bit low quality and low color reproduction.       

So time and again, during the course of my research I have been coming across a few lenses and they are popping up on various forum discussions. I have mostly listed primes as zooms are considered a bit soft and not so sharp. 

           AF Nikkor 20mm f2.8D – Though not entirely practical for fashion but possibly feasible, the 20mm lens can be used for wide outdoor shots. Color rendition is superb as is edge to edge sharpness. After this one the 24mm f2.8D, 28mm F2.8D and 35mm F2 follow up in focal length but are not good at all, so better skip these three. Price: INR 32,335/-

          AF Nikkor 50mm f1.4D - The catalogue says quality optics, superb resolution, color reproduction and fine detail. It is mostly true. The pictures I have checked out on flickr confirm this. A great lens for portraits. Can be used for body shots in a mid size studio. Price: INR 16,000/-

          AF Micro Nikkor 60mm f2.8D – The catalogue describes this lens as crisp and it surely is. This is also a great portrait lens as it comes to around 90mm on APS-C cameras. Note that this is designated ‘Micro’ that means a real macro lens from Nikon, flowers bees, you know the drill. Price: INR 25,180/-

           Nikkor 85mm f1.4D IF – This is ‘the’ lens to have for fashion photography. Everything else is an excuse. Melissa Rodwell swears by this one. Both the color rendition and sharpness are amazing. Internal Focus. Surprisingly, for some strange reason this lens is not listed in the catalogue I have. Price: INR 67,000/-

           Nikkor 85mm f1.8D – The catalogue says crisp, natural image reproduction with high contrast. Though not that bad a lens to have, definitely not as good as the 85mm 1.4. The only consolation is the sharpness and the price. Price: INR 23,785/-

          AF DC Nikkor 105mm f2D – This is a Defocus Image Control lens which means you can control the soft focus in the foreground and background. The sharpness and bokeh on this one are out of this world. Just get this one. Price: INR 57,215/-

          AF DC Nikkor 135 f2D – This one too is a Defocus lens and has excellent sharpness and color rendition. It costs 10k more for the extra reach in focal length and at f2 is reasonably fast. Price: INR 67,165/-

Though this list not exhaustive, it pretty much covers from wide angle to telephotos. Readers can also suggest other lenses with samples if possible, that will help other people as well. One or two or three lenses from this list will get you started. To save money you can buy lenses during festive offers with special discounts, rent them if you don’t have the money or pool some money together along with some like minded photographer friends to buy it or borrow it from some one who is not using them.

Goodluck and happy clicking J

--Viisshnu--